Addiction

December 5th, 2017

The one of the key level it will be used when causality in the acquisition or maintenance of the addiction exists, Charlie (anxiety before its social incapacities is committed) with his pair, its friendly and with his therapist to work this level it stops to be able to surpass it. Finally the one of the maximum impact that is used in complicated cases of addiction, where the implication of multiple levels like cause, effect or maintenance of the conduct of addictive are evident; in this case the interventions will be varied with the purpose of to secure the maximum impact, and it is applied of sinrgica form instead of sequential. We imagine that Charlie had problems with the addiction to the alcohol 7 years ago. From this hypothesis, according to this theory the passages from their conduct of risk to their conduct of health would be: Precontemplacin: At that time Charlie did not assume to have a conduct of risk with its health and it did not have intention to change his addictive behavior to the alcohol, whose ingestion was in 1/4 liter of daily wine in meals and 1 or 2 alcohol glasses of high degree (40) from the dusk until it was going away to sleep; therefore, it does not see risk nor problems for his health. Source: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. It ignores the benefits of not continuing with this conduct of risk, having a greater perception on the barriers practices, feeling demoralized against their capacity to change and do not want to think about it. When its Mathew friendly, Phoebe, and their Mnica pair indicates to him that its ingestion is excessive, perhaps it is settled in Charlie a questioning on the matter; it is through these personal relations of aid when the motivation for the change or decision making takes place. Thus it is introduced a process of change through an increase of awareness so that its capacity of perception of the negative aspects is increased on its health and the impact (evaluation) in its interpersonal relations. .

Tags:

Comments are closed.